













[2 Pack] Pumice Stone for Toilet Cleaning, Pumice Cleaning Stone Toilet Bowl with Extra Long Handle for Removing Toilet Bowl Ring, Pool, Bathroom,Toilet Brush, Tiles & BBQ Grills
-
Angela F.
> 3 dayThe clean well in some places and others not as well. They also dont last long. But overall theyre okay. I wish they were a little more durable.
-
Steven Tonkinson
> 3 dayI was surprised how well this product worked. The long handle is an advantage.
-
Jodi Lavely
> 3 dayWe have iron stains in our toilets from time to time. This product works well to rid the porcelain of the stains!
-
Alessandra Ondricka I
Greater than one weekIt was used to clean the toilets. It did a great job and I would definitely recommend it.
-
patricia garcia
Greater than one weekLove it and removes calcium buildup !!!!
-
Isabel Urena
> 3 dayI recently move to a new apartment and the toilet has a lot of stains on it. I tried cleaning product but it didn’t do much. So I decided to look for something on Amazon and I came across this product and I gave it a try. It worked very well. I still see some light stains but I didn’t keep trying for a long time. So every time I clean my bathroom I will use it. I think this product did the job. I really recommend it.
-
Jacqui R.
08-06-2025This product is amazing. I’ve had a ring in both my toilets for a few years and tried everything to get it out..nothing worked. Tried this and I am singing songs of joy! My toilet looks new again!!! Will continue to buy for future use!
-
DuhGlitch
> 3 dayThe title is exactly how I feel about this product. Thanks to the handle, they are easy to use on toilet rings; but they deteriorate very quickly, so they dont last long at all.
-
Me
> 3 dayLove the long handle for removing foot callus in shower. Can also use for ovens, toilets etc. But I just use them for my feet.( I dont mix n match tho.)LOL ew.
-
Morgan
> 3 dayPumice stone is permanently fixed to the handle so the handle is disposable instead of being able to replace the stone. Amazon recommended buying packages of stones with it which was misleading.