Calvin Klein Mens Cotton Multipack Briefs

Consistent quality

Like many of the reviewers here, were suffering for an overall downgrade in the quality of mens underwear (well, many other manufactured items also but thats a longer discussion). Anyway, used to rely on the CKs. I tried others and found I also liked Dockers. Same quality, better price, so I switched. Went to buy new ones recently as the old ones have finally (and reasonably) worn out. Well, I cant find Docker briefs anymore at all. I mean, I do a web search and a lot of links show up but when you go to the sites, they are nowhere in site. (stuck in the matrix, I guess). SO, I tried some other brands: Jockey, Gilden, others. Meh! They all tend to run small, thin fabric, lame waistband, which is often course/irritating. So, I go back to CKs. Well, they aint what they used to be but theyre a bit better than the rest. Whats with the tags though?! I thought we were trying to move away from flappy tags. See pic. Whatever. Thesell have to do. (Yeah, 4 stars seems a lot. Its just in comparison to all the lousy options)

Comfy briefs. Too many, I mean one is too many, tags. Four, to be exact.

Tags were annoying, cut them off and didnt have issues with left-over snaggy pieces of the tags but just annoying to buy from a company like CK and have to hassle with that crap. Seems like it should be pretty damn obvious to any underwear/clothing company that is run by human beings who have ever worn clothes, or robots that have been programmed to listen to the most basic customer feedback... to just lose the damn tags. In the end, once the changes are put in place - I would think that a tagless brief would mean: 1. Use of less material. 2. Less stitching/less complicated production process. 3. Would provide an idea for something to mention in a stupid commercial or print ad when the advertiser bros cant think of anything to say about underwear. Those days where after sitting in the conference room for 6 hours, the only thing those bros you pay 6-figures have to show for their time is a marker board that says Underwear Brainstorming at the top and these points listed below: - Shoot in black and white, as always. But with 2 white models, as always. In a windy bedroom, as always. - Be original, as always. - Highly attractive young adult muscular man. - Man wears product (Underwear). - Female appears. Highly attractive, unhealthily-thin, seems significantly younger than product-wearing-man. - Female displays Über-lust-filled eyes showcasing the enchanting, borderline-illegal, seductive spell the underwear casts on her. *list would end here* - but not today, thanks to your genius decision to boldly remove the part of your product that nobody wants, instead... (now they can add something stupid to the brainstorm board about the tags finally being gone - like No-Tags-Attached lunch meeting or no shirt, no shoes, no tags - or any number of mind-numbingly stupid ways of bragging that you stopped doing something you never should have done in the first place) 4. Increased customer satisfaction. I guess just focus on number 4, might be reason enough to get rid of the tags. Balls in your court, CK... no pun intended

The tags seem weird in the age of tagless underwear. Amazon suggested that I go a size up and get XL instead of L based on customer reviews. Unless there is shrinkage noticeable after the first wash then L is the correct size as opposed to the Amazon suggestion that I go a size-up to XL.

These are awesome CKs. I ordered the White 4-Pack. Ive been wearing these for years and I also wear the CK Low Rise Brief they kind off look the same as these). I always order a size up from normal. Im a 38 waist and I always order a XL as I like these loose. These are great to wear with work wear and or jeans on the weekend. I get lots of looks with these. I never thought that tighty whities would attract a lot of attention. I like these loose and thats why I order up a size from normal. Really comfortable and last for ages. I like them as I feel they get better with age. The quality is cool and I always go sagging in these sometimes with jeans on, I wear these around these around the house a lot as they are cool and comfortable. The cover my butt and jewels really well. Highly recommend these. Once again, I bought a size up from normal as I like these guys loose on my body. Best thing is they look really sexy as well. Go for these guys! Order was processed well and the order arrived pretty quickly. I will be ordering more in the near future.

very comfortable and spacious

Good quality, good fit, my be a bit high waisted for some, but good for me. Many other brands have big holes for the legs, but mine are pretty thin so these smaller leg holes are perfect for me. Not good if you have big thighs.

Satisfied

These are functional, soft, and generally pretty comfortable. However, given they come at a very premium price, I dont really think theyre any better than your standard underwear you can get at Walmart (or Amazon) for significantly cheaper. I can see why others are questioning if theyre knockoffs (they arent - I wondered this too and actually ordered a second pack directly from CK, and theyre exactly the same). They dont really look premium either - just basic briefs, which is fine, but not really worth the price. I also have no idea why they put FOUR labels on the back that you have to cut out - the remaining tag is annoying too. The waistbands feel very cheap and have a slight tendency to roll...theyre pretty narrow and they sit low enough that this usually isnt a big issue, but its noticeable. Fit is as expected, though. Overall, theyre fine but just not worth the price.