JBL Charge 3 Waterproof Portable Bluetooth Speaker (Black), 1

All very good accept you sent me 2 I only ordered 1

even after my kid dropped it its still working

Great quality speaker! Sounds good/loud and is still going strong after years! I definitely recommend it!

Envío rápido y excelente calidad ☺️

JBL Charge 3 adds new dimension to old favorites. Awesome sound and power in our convertible and our boat, utilizing Sirius XM app from my I phone. When we are home, it is connected to Alexa, as the sound in our Echo 8 is greatly improved. Great value and eliminated the need to update our older audio systems. Extended battery life allows for playing all weekend between recharges. I would definitely buy another one.

I was given one of these as a gift many years ago. It just finally stopped working. I did lots of research to decide which JBL would be the best replacement. I was very happy to see this model offered again. Its excellent quality, reliable and holds its charge for a long time. It really is water & dust proof. I used my older one while doing all sorts of projects indoors and out where moisture and dust were everywhere....it continued to work very well.

Very good sound quality. My husband is very satisfied with them!

Two of us did listening comparison tests between the following models: Sony SRS-X55 30W $149.99 JBL Charge 3 $124.18 Anker Soundcore Boost 20W $79 To break in the units, we ran pink noise (from mynoise.net) @85dB measured at 1m on each unit for ~9,11, and 9 hours on the Anker, Sony, and JBL respectively All but one of the recordings used in the test .aiff form. These were converted to 24 bit FLAC recordings before transferring to a Nexus 5x source device. The one remaining recording was directly recorded to a 96/24 .wav file before transferring to the Nexus 5x. Recordings used for comparison were as follows: Familiar voices: Direct to digital recording of a voice one of the listeners knows well. A Zoom H4N with built in condenser microphones was used for the recording Pink Floyd Dark Side of the Moon, Time looking for clear echo and clearly separate percussion instruments Vivaldi - Le Quattro Stagioni. Concerto Italiano. Naive OP30363 Track 6 - Tempo Impetuoso D Estate43-117: speed test AC/DC Its a Long Way to the Top... about ~1:25 in: bagpipes: how clean? Vivaldi - Vespri per l Assunzione di Maria Vergine. Concerto Italiano. Naive OP30383 Track 5 of CD 2 - Cum dederit: Vocals Should sound smooth, with no harsh resonances Frank Sinatra, Moon River... Track 2 Moon river guitar ~40 before the end YoYo Ma Obrigado Brazil Track six 2:30+? Beethoven - Die 5 Klavierkonzerte - Pollini, Abbado/BPO. DG 439770-2 Deutsche Grammophon 439770-2. 3. Rondo (Allegro) Dynamic test, especially between 2.5 and 5 To make comparisons easier, we listened to these units in pairs. First off was to compare the two most expensive units: the Sony and the JBL. After comparing five different recordings, the difference was clear, so we didnt go any further. The results were as follows: Familiar voices: Sony: distorted the sound like the voice was coming from a box JBL: cleaner. Time: Both: The bass was crushed at 2:12 in the recording JBL: The Toms were more forward Sony: Sounded like something was in the way of the toms Op 30636 @~1:00: Both: Not even close to following this recording. AC/DC: JBL: Missing fullness in bagpipes, but there was no harshness. Sony: Harsh Bagpipes OP30383 (1:07+): JBL: Some finger on chalk board harshness Sony: harshness was worse. --- with the Sony eliminated, we went on to compare the Anker to the JBL: OP30383: Anker: Less harsh than the JBL, but still had the problem. AC/DC: Anker: Cleaner than the JBL Sinatra: JBL: The sometimes hidden guitar was clear and the vocals were full Anker: Guitar not as clear, but still audible Familiar voices: JBL: fuller, but more muffled Anker: clear, but not as full Yo Yo Ma: JBL: Bass has character Anker: missing character in Bass Beethoven turned all the way up: JBL: ~3dB louder than Anker, and any muffling is gone at higher levels. Anker: No obvious clipping, but sound not as pleasant --- Summary: For its price, the Anker was very competitive, but considering we are likely to use these units close to their maximum level a fair amount of time, the JBL was the clear winner overall. The IPX7 waterproof rating of the JBL over the IPX5 of the Anker further confirmed that decision, since these units were likely to be used in uncontrolled environments. The Sony was not only the highest price of the three, but the sound was generally worse than the others, so it was not even considered for the final purchase.

Probably a bit early to rate battery life. Good so far.