Shirley Temple Baby Burlesque (in Color)
-
Yvonne C.
> 3 dayOffensive, sexual references all over the place, they even made the babies racist and the black baby is running around saying yessuh boss and acting like a dummy. I used to like Shirley Temple when I was a kid. Now that Im an adult, this looks like a pedophiles wet dream.
-
Kristina
24-11-2024this is sick i looked at it for 5 min and this is sick what everyone else said in the review
-
A. Kujo
> 3 dayI never review films on here, and the other reviewers pretty much nailed it, but this creeped me out so much I felt compelled to rate it anyway. Why are all the toddlers half to mostly naked at all times? In the first one, why is the one kid sucking milk out of a glove (after catching a stream of it on his face from above) when there are BOTTLES EVERYWHERE??? Why is the poor Black kid speaking twice as slow as the others and stripping on the table? Why are the male Native Warriors tugging the screaming Shirley Temple into different directions as if to imply theyre about to cart her off? Oh my God -- so many questions. I have so many questions and I want none of them answered. I get that this was A Different Time, and Im capable of watching other time capsules of racism and problematic themes while taking into consideration the context, but I reeeeally dont understand how this was okay back in the day. Maybe the jazz cigarettes were a little too potent back then, who knows, but in the meantime Im going to take a long shower and try to steel wool this collection out of my brain.
-
Jennifer
Greater than one weekWhy is Amazon advocating child exploitation by offering this very offensive title? I could only watch it for a few minutes because it was just so creepy and disturbing.
-
Rene
> 3 dayI know these were made for a very different generation and a very different time in our society, but I can only see them though the eyes of todays society. I know at the time they were considered cute and were made with that intention, but in all honesty, given the way things are today I found these creepy and somewhat disturbing.
-
Zak
> 3 dayIn my opinion, these belong in a different camp from the rest of the interesting material from the early 20th century that has recently made it to Prime and may not be suitable for the audience its being suggested for. These films were made as a way to normalize racism and pedophilia. The only reason anyone should be watching these today should be if theyre writing a report on why racism and pedophilia is so rampant and normalized in America...
-
Bookaholic
> 3 dayThis should not be on Amazon its disgusting. Literally children pornography and racism . I understand it was a different time but as its fine we should not be honouring or remastering and bringing back for other people to see.
-
Rachael
> 3 dayThis should be considered child pornography!
-
Daniel Matz
Greater than one weekI agreed with the other reviewers. This belongs in the category of Child Bride. One cant just shrug off the sexual content as innocent or antiquated.