CASIO PRIZM FX-CG50 Color Graphing Calculator,Black & White,7.21Wx10.32Lx2.05H
-
Paula Arrieta
Greater than one weekUtil
-
Martha Milena Rueda
> 3 dayThis product turns on and works Jokes aside, its a good calculator It does what its supposed to do
-
Gentleman of the Road
> 3 dayFast and loaded with features, but its too easy to enter into submenus accidentally and inconvenient to find and press the two keys needed to quit out of them.
-
Nicki
> 3 dayHaving to use AAA batteries is worth what this calculator is capable of. Upsides: It graphs up to 20 functions in a fraction of the time of the ti 84. You can choose decimal or exact outputs for your calculations. It has statistics, spreadsheet, and even Python programming capabilities. It has an app specifically for calculating finances. It has a list of 6 different probability simulators. It has 50 or so different conversion capabilities. It has a massive list of commonly used constants in maths, physics, etc. It even has a built in periodic table with quick descriptions of where some of the elements can be found. It also has a test mode that can be activated, making it school test legal. Downsides: It’s possible to accidentally delete apps if you are unsure of what you’re doing. They can be easily recovered on Casio’s website however. It is not as user friendly as the TI series of calculators. It’s quite a bit more complicated than them, but is offset by the fact that it is capable of a lot more. Casio does have a hefty user guide online for it, which is nice if you really want to figure it all out. I am extremely pleased with this calculator. It was absolutely worth the sale price, and definitely worth its normal price. Since it can run Python programs, I’m going to try and get it to run Doom.
-
rainman
> 3 dayits really good calculator except the answer is so different from Ti calculators. this is the problem. its Statistics in particular. on getting the P score on Z. in NormCDF(17, 1000000, 4.3, 18.7) thats the casio. its meant NormCDF(lower, Upper, standard deviation, Mean). the only difference from the Ti calculators is the position of mean and standard deviation position. the answer in Casio is this 0.6537072691 and the Ti calculator answer is 0.6537072226. I dont know which one is correct and wrong.
-
ALVARO CASALLAS
Greater than one weekFácil de usar, funciones muy completas
-
Ethan Jeffcott
> 3 dayGreat Calculator! I use it for math class, and it has a very nice visual display, so it puts exponents where they should be. Can also run a gameboy emulator very easily. Prizoop works for Pokemon, installed onto calculator in 2 minutes. Great overall!
-
Luis
Greater than one weekIve been using this calculator for about a year and half, and it works extremely well. Ive used the TI-84,83,82,81 models. Theyre all decent, but this has an incredibly easy to use interface. This one is clear, easy to see, has a lot more features than the TI models, and is way cheaper. I actually gave away my TI when I started using this one because of how much better this one is. If you are going into either high school or college, I would highly recommend this calculator. The only thing is sometimes the menus can be a bit confusing, but overall its an incredible buy, and is always in my backpack.
-
Martinez
> 3 dayOverall a complete and full featured graphing calculator. It will and can get you through every standard math course in college that you will take. From your basic algebra course to a differential equation course. It will also get you through stats classes. So feature wise this calculator is the equal of the TI-84 Plus CE (if not better in some areas due to its menu driven GUI vs TIs list based GUI system). Hardware wise the CG-FX 50 is superior in processor speed, screen space, font size, and graph rendering speed vs the TI-84 Plus CE. Cost wise it blows the TI-84 Plus CE out of the water. So in both performance, features and price the Casio CG-FX 50 is the way to go. P.S. The CG-FX 10 Prism is a great predecessor from which this calculator was derived from but it too is over priced on Amazon. The CG-FX 50 is the successor of that calculator and so it makes sense to pick the CG-FX 50 over the CG-FX -10. Never mind the updated button styling from CGFX-10 which was non-standard vs the standard button styling of the CG-FX 50 that mirrors most other calculators. If this does not make sense to you or actually matter to you a all then dont worry about it. Just realize that the CG-FX 50 is the superior choice here as well.
-
Alejandra rivera basto
> 3 dayLlegó en perfectas condiciones y funciona muy bien