SAMSUNG 970 EVO Plus SSD 1TB NVMe M.2 Internal Solid State Hard Drive, V-NAND Technology, Storage and Memory Expansion for Gaming, Graphics w/ Heat Control, Max Speed, MZ-V7S1T0B/AM
-
coffinbell
> 3 dayat 59.99 these are a super bargain, but for over 120 dollars, no.
-
Oscar D.
> 3 dayThe description said that it was fully tested by amazon and they guaranted it. As you can see in the video. thats not and NVME M.2 ssd its a SATA. and its a Disk of 60gb....
-
Wayne A Lawrence
> 3 dayCant go wrong with Samsung. Fast and trouble free.
-
James E. Hanlon
> 3 dayGood memory stick.
-
KimchiRednecks
> 3 dayUpdated version of the 970 EVO. Basically as fast as it gets without needing a gen 4 disk. Price is a bit high. You can get the Sabrent 1TB gen 4 cheaper that the 1TB 970 EVO Plus. Almost the same speeds at gen 3 althought the 970 is a touch faster.
-
Chris
> 3 dayWindows 11 boots in 35-40 seconds. Photoshop and other heavyweight software love it.
-
Gerry
> 3 dayCloned for my new pc and it makes it hum. Work it hard and no temp problems. I did add a heat sink. Like the speed and space. Samsung makes the best sad hard drives
-
Tristan Dupree
Greater than one weekDrive was installed with new PC build, and the machine would not boot properly. GPU was not recognized due to faulty drive. Replaced the M.2 and everything worked perfectly fine. Did receive a speedy refund from Amazon once the failure was recognized, but a weeks worth of troubleshooting headache. Im more wary of buying electronics online now, easier to spend the 2% more at Micro Center knowing they will work when brought home functional.
-
LEE
> 3 dayThe best ssd! Im very satisfied with the performance and price.
-
Bobbo
> 3 dayAll I can say is wow! I returned an ADATA XPG SX8200 PRO 500GB for this one and am so glad I did. All PCIE NVME drives are not created equal and benchmarks dont mean anything because they are synthetic and the drives are built to show the best performance on the benchmarks, which can be a far cry from how they actually perform. First the XPG SX8200 Pro website only gives you the best specs from the 1TB drive and its nearly impossible to find the slower performance information of the 512GB and 256GB drive on their website (should be a big hint to performance since they dont easily publish it, or list the smaller drive specs on the main page). Second, the bench marks were pretty close on cyrstal diskmark, but when I was actually testing 9GB file copies to and from the XPG, it was often below 600MB/s (even as low as 150MB/s steadily). It did perform better at times, but it was so spotty and nowhere near the benchmarks on a regular basis, I either got a dud or its just not as good as the specs are in real world performance. Yeah, it was about $30 cheaper than the the new Samsung EVO PLUS 970, but in the end, the price difference was waaaaay overshadowed by the real world performance.
