Intel Core i7-9700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 3.6 GHz Turbo unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
-
む
Greater than one week第6世代のcpuから乗せ換えです。
-
Lothar
> 3 daythe 9700k is probably meant for people looking to upgrade from less performant chips or building a new PC, and will probably replace the 8700k in the lineup, naturally.
-
Tyler Grommesh
23-11-2024Some would argue that an i9 9900k is better. I disagree. A 9900k gives you very little return for the premium that you pay over an i7 9700k. This isnt the cheapest but If you are aiming for a $2000ish PC build -- go for a 9700k.
-
Mofos
> 3 dayGood
-
MIT
Greater than one weekGreat fastest I’ve had so I can’t compare. Easy to install and great performance.
-
Vic
> 3 dayNothing to dislike. Super chip.
-
Christian
> 3 dayJe suis très satisfait par ce processeur qui ma fortement réduit mes temps de travaux de développements photos et qui me permets de travailler en pleine image avec Lightroom avec mon Behringer X Touch mini , par contre il chauffait beaucoup lors des fortes sollicitations ( 77°c ventilo à 100% ) avec un air-cooling Be quiet Pure Rock slim BK008 que jai remplacé par le Darck Rock Pro 4 ( 59°c en mode normal ) .
-
hanaKGT
Greater than one weekRTX2080と一緒に使っている。CPU使用率が20%超えたことないくらい使いこなせないが、良いものだと思う。CPUクーラーがついてなかったので別売のを急いでかつ適当に買った。グラボがでかいCPUクーラーもでかいで内部の配線の取り回しに苦労した。
-
Dominic
> 3 dayBack in summer of 2014, I got a gaming PC that had an Intel i7-4820K CPU @ 3.70GHz, which was a 4-core 8-thread CPU that handled just about everything I wanted to play for the next three-four years. However, Battlefield 1, at some point, changed its CPU optimization and made the game run way worse on my CPU, and some other newer games were also starting to not perform as well, so I decided it was time to upgrade my CPU. Originally planned to go with the i9, but after learning that it doesnt offer much (if any) performance increase for gaming and cost $200 more, I went with this.
-
Rick Nikolaus MD
Greater than one weekprocesador muy mejorable